3 Reasons to Use a Dynamic Mic on Vocals

In all the magazine ads and music videos, this one thing is a staple.

Whether it’s a documentary on your favorite band, a movie scene in a recording studio, or a full-page ad in Sweetwater‘s latest catalog, one common theme exists: vocalists use large-diaphragm condenser mics.

I’m not a big fan of the phrase “that’s how we’ve always done it.” Certainly we should learn from the experience of others, but doing something JUST because everyone else does it leads to a fairly boring experience.

Do I use a condenser mic on vocals? Sure…but not exclusively.

I’ve mentioned this before. On my album, I used three different microphones — a tube condenser mic, a regular condenser mic, and a dynamic mic. Why? Because I chose the mic that sounded best for that particular song.

Some days one mic just didn’t sound that great. I switched it out, liked what I heard, and moved on.

More and more, I reach for the dynamic mic when I need to record a vocalist. Here are 3 reasons why.

Less Room Noise

If you record in a noisy room (and most of us do), then you’re constantly battling picking up noise in your recordings. Whether it’s the computer fan, hard drives, lawnmowers outside (or inside) — it’s a common problem.

Condenser mics are wonderful. They’re detailed and crisp, but they sometimes pick up EVERYTHING.

Because dynamic mics are less sensitive than condensers, you can record the vocalist without all the extra noise. This reason alone should be enough to convince you to try it.

Less De-Essing Needed

Sibilance can make or break a lead vocal track. Condenser mics tend to really emphasize the S’s and T’s of a singer. Typically, you’ll reach for your handy de-esser plugin…but they don’t always work perfectly.

A dynamic mic, on the other hand, doesn’t capture all that extra high frequency material, and it tends to not need a de-esser at all, even with heavy compression.

Less Likely to Be Harsh

Dynamic mics don’t have the high end of condensers. That’s a given. In some scenarios this may sound dull or dark, but I submit to you that condensers can sound overly bright and harsh at times.

If you’re getting a harsh sound with your condenser, it may be time to switch to a dynamic. It won’t have nearly the high end detail of a condenser, but it probably won’t have the harshness either.

One final point on dynamic mics, if you don’t have a decent preamp with a lot of gain, you may have problems. Dynamic mics have a much weaker signal than condensers, so you need to have a preamp that can give you enough gain without adding a lot of additional noise.

So…are you going to try using a dynamic mic on your next vocal session?

[Photo Credit]

If you enjoyed this, you might also like...

  1. Why You Should Use a Condenser Mic on Vocals
  2. Great Acoustic Guitar Tone – The Mic (Part 3 of 7)
  3. Processing Vocals Part 1 – Recording the Vocal
  4. The Solution to “Thin” Vocals
  5. 3 Reasons to Stereo-Mic Acoustic Guitar (with audio examples)
  • Pingback: Details Of The Studio Projects Large Diaphragm Condenser

  • http://www.facebook.com/raphaelcassis Raphael Cassis

    Hey Joe, which dynamic mic do you recomend for vocals? I already have the SM58 and SM57…

    • CamBam

      those are great mics! try them both, and then if you feel like upgrading, get a better one.

  • http://twitter.com/ZachDrakeTweets ZachDrake

    Question though: Do “live” condensers like a Shure SM86 respond differently then a large diaphragm condenser?

  • http://twitter.com/ZachDrakeTweets ZachDrake

    I actually saw a good example of a dynamic mic this week. A christian rock group called Hillsong Live released a new album tuesday. I was watching the recording of some of the acoustic songs and I noticed that EVERY mic was dynamic. All the way down to the beta’s on the acoustic guitar. However when you close your eyes and just listen, IT SOUNDS GREAT! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23vkW-hCabk&ob=av2n

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Bodah/760009773 Mark Bodah

    already do. for all the reasons you mentioned. i have experimented with setting my LDC and my surprisingly great-sounding no-name dynamic next to each other, doing a vocal take and seeing which sounds better in the mix–seems to be the dynamic every time. i use the LDC all the time on my own voice, but i’m going to try switching to see what happens.

  • http://twitter.com/HastingsCutoff Joe Cushman

    I did this the other night when I started tracking vocals for an album.  The singer has a really high/harsh kind of voice and is mocking the 80′s glam/power metal, so were some issues when I started tracking with the condenser.  Tracked him with an SM58 and, while I lost a little bit of detail, I believe the end result to be more desirable.

    Also, whenever I’m tracking harsh vocals for a heavier band, especially if it’s someone without a lot of range in their screams/yells, I tend to end up using a dynamic.  Good article, Joe.